The Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education, or FURRIES, Act, filed by Austin-area Republican State Rep. Stan Gerdes, would “prohibit any non-human behavior by a student, including presenting himself or herself, on days other than exempt days, as anything other than a human being.”

The law would allow for exempt days, such as Halloween and other school dress-up days.

The law defines “non-human” behavior as “any type of behavior or accessory displayed by a student in a school district other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species,” with provided examples being:

Using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine or other human byproducts

A personal or outward display, except during a school play or by a school mascot, through surgical or superficial means of features that are non-human such as using tails, leashes, collars or other accessories designed for pets

Using fur, other than naturally occurring human hair or a wig made to look like human hair

Artificial, animal-like ears

Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

Licking oneself or others for the purpose of grooming or maintenance.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    21 days ago

    Man they are still caught up on that fake story somebody sent to one of these morons claiming kids were using litter boxes in school. It never happened but they’re going to try to legislate it away anyway.

    The lesson here is don’t troll these idiots, they’ll fucking believe it and then start passing idiotic laws for non-problems.

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 days ago

      And when you try and tell anyone who bought it they say there is evidence, while never being able to provide any.

      • gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        They will say this legislation proves its real. Why else would this legislation exist? I’m sure the lawmakers have all the evidence.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      The weird thing is for some reason people will lie to perpetuate these falsehoods

      Like I do therapy and I talk to teenagers regularly because teenagers need mental health support, obviously. And sometimes they’ll bring up shit like this: “my school installed a litter box because of these woke kids”

      But even the most basic of prodding: “did they really” with a tone of like “come on” and they’ll backpedal, “well no, but like there are kids that have fursonas and shit”

      It’s crazy to see it start so young. They’re realizing at like 16 they can get adults to gang up on the kid they think is weird by being dishonest, and adults buy into it because it’s a chance to bully someone weaker and politicians jump on it because it’s a new wedge issue to distract people from class consciousness

      And what’s crazy is that by some perspectives if I call them out on this dishonesty and point out this cycle I’m indoctrinating them

    • something_random_tho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      It’s funny a Portuguese person just told me the same story happened in PT to justify anti-trans positions. So it’s the same bullshit story, localized, and repeated.

      • 🇨🇦 holdstrong@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Yep, we had the exact same fake news story spread in Canada, and used as cover for anti-trans policies. Can we put some tariffs on disinformation please?

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      what? absolutely troll these idiots now that we know they are very susceptible.

      just do it in a way they pass good laws out of fear instead.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      While you’re right about that being fake, it’s just pandering to their base who do take issue with forms of self-expression that are common amongst queer, trans and/or autistic students. Things like wearing a collar, a tail or cat ears are absolutely relatively common and this bill targets those all the same.

      • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        My daughters love wearing cat-ear headbands. It’s cute, they like it, end of story. Nobody has thrown a fit about it yet… 🤞🤞

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      The take is to actually troll these idiots, but with stuff that lead to idiotic laws so inconvenient that even their voter base will hate them for it.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      The lesson here is don’t troll these idiots, they’ll fucking believe it and then start passing idiotic laws for non-problems.

      Throwback to when 4chan started memeing about pizzas, and the resulting chain of events led to a real pizza parlor being shot up by a right-wing nut job who thought it was full of pedophiles.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      These are the same sort of dumbfucks that absolutely believed the “LSD stickers/tattoos” bullshit way, way back and would insist on schools passing out flyers based on that stupid urban legend.

      I remember being in sixth grade when they had a bout of that going around our school, and I was like, wait, what? And I had a lot of doubts. And that’s when I was in sixth grade. Years later, you could look it up and see what nonsense it was. Anyway, I was at TWO different jobs where someone was trying to “inform parents” with some printouts they had about you guessed it, the bullshit LSD stickers nonsense. The first time, I told them “you know, this is urban legend, right?” I get immediately treated like I’m some kind of criminal that does not want to protect the children.

      I suspect the bullshit around litter boxes will have a similar lifetime among those that are hard of thinking.

      • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        That’s how this whole “kids are identifying as cats and using litter boxes at school” shitshow started.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      I always love using that example to dismiss some concerns about deepfakes sparking national conspiracies.

      Nobody even tried to fake a picture of it. I’ve seen photos on lemmy of people shaving their heads in weird ways or making some horrible bean-themed food just for the karma. Throwing an empty litter box in an empty classroom takes much less effort yet nobody even bothered.

  • regrub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 days ago

    They’re going after easy targets like schools because if they targeted furries in the state government, all of the IT infrastructure would crumble.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      Hah, that made me chuckle. I recently attended an outdoor market in my area that for some reason had an unusually high number of furries wandering around it. I was really curious what the bus factor of that market would actually be.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Yeah in this case I kind of meant the corollary to a bus factor. Essentially if everyone at that market disappeared, how many companies would be severely impacted?

          • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            No worries, I understood what you meant. It’s like that photo of all the furries on an airplane… Pray it doesn’t crash or else the world infrastructure is done for 😂

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      I’m frankly shocked it hasn’t already, the pay for government IT jobs is kinda shit, and they’ve been trying to slash federal employee benefits for years (theres been recent rumors of increasing mandatory FERS deductions and turning insurance into a voucher program). they’ve started going after anyone LGBTQ+ federally as well.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Ultimately the problem is that that works in their favour. Remember the Republican position is “The Government doesn’t work and if you put me in charge of it I’ll prove it!”, so the only thing they need to do is destroy anything they can get their hands on. The only part of the government they care about (other than their specific seat) is the military. They will gleefully watch everything else burn and then point at the ashes as proof they were right all along.

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          They piss on the DoD and call it rain too, just not as much. Contractors generally make more than the civilian employees at the cost of potentially getting screwed over at the end of the contract or during a shutdown (realistically, I’ve heard it doesn’t happen that often, they’ll usually just get hired by whoever gets the next contract), and civilian employees just get more stable work hours and benefits (separate annual/sick leave pools, insurance, etc); if shit needs done after hours, they’ll call the active duty folks in, and if they cant make things work it’ll wait till morning.

  • Tomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    21 days ago

    Can we still say “what’s up, dawg?”

    It is funny that the litter box story was taken as gospel.

    What a time to be alive.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 days ago

    Wow.

    I remember learning about dinosaurs as an elementary schooler after Jurassic Park came out, and spending a few months on the playground pretending to be a velociraptor (well technically they’re closer to deinonychous but w/e) … apparently that is now banned, because otherwise I might have become a scaly, for life?

    Wonderful.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 days ago

    Texans, next time you look at the prices in the grocery store, remember that this is what your representatives are spending their time on.

  • Fingolfinz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 days ago

    It’s incredible that republicans can constantly waste tax dollars on worthless shit like this and still be viewed as the party of financial responsibility by their dumb ass voting base

      • Fingolfinz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        That’s a really good point I didn’t consider. Just like it was with “eggs”, the “financial responsibility” crap really is just a front they put up in bad faith to avoid admitting that it’s all about racism

  • pivot_root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

    I’m not quite sure what it is exactly (/s), but maybe—just maybe—this is yet another attempt to fuck over and ostracize transfem and autistic people, but instead of being direct about it, using furries as the boogeyman.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    I wonder how much of this is borne out of the hysteria over kids supposedly using litter boxes.

    I had some gomer on the Denver Post forums that kept insisting it was not only a thing, but an epidemic. I kept asking him for the supposed evidence of this claim, all he could say was that he “talks to lots and lots of parents and teachers” and “the media won’t report on it”.

    • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      It’s trivial to verify. Slap 20 bucks on the table and say “20 bucks you can’t list a location with a litterbox for furries”

      “talks to lots and lots of parents and teachers” and “the media won’t report on it”.

      Ain’t gonna get you 20 bucks. Need a location. If you get a location, call 'em. They’ll confirm or deny. (They’re gonna deny)

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Any behavior humans do is human behavior, this law is legally dubious at best. Mimicking animals has been a human thing since humans came to be.

    Okay seriously, did someone write this law just so it could be contested in court??

    The forbid non human speech is written as onomatopoeias. Like how can you call that stuff nonhuman speech after literally writing it in human language? If I read this part of the law out loud am I violating the law?

    I could also see the rights to perform cultural religious dances being infringed upon by this law.

    • chameleon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 days ago

      Gives them excuses to punish “weird”/non-perfectly-conforming kids. The definition of the actual law is broad and open to more or less any interpretation you want it to have.

  • oyo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    Maybe the constitution of the United States of America says something about this? Maybe like the first thing in the bill of rights? Nah I must be mistaken.

    • theshoeshiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Schools have to maintain a certain level of order and conformity to function as intended. Courts have already ruled as much. You can’t engage in behavior which would prevent the system from working as intended e.g. walk around topless, yell profanities, play loud music, etc - things which you can obviously do in other public spaces. Wearing full body animal costumes or barking randomly, claiming its your identity, is just as ridiculous and just as disorderly.

      With that said, schools probably already had the tools they needed to stop this, so I’m not sure why a law was needed. Unless there was actually some furry zealot fighting against a school board.

      • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        yeah ok but like schools can make policy. If someone is doing something thats an issue there’s a dean for a reason.

        Also, I don’t think a headband with ears is really the biggest issue of our times right now. This is entirely useless and just for control. Same with banning books, there’s already systems in place. Globally banning things -that AREN’T an issue- does not help anybody at all.

        This is ONLY for erasure of demographics and control over the people. Starts with furries, then men in skirts, then anything queer at all.

      • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        I just had a read through the bill and, as written, it would prohibit elementary school children from playing pretend as animals on the school playground during recess. Obviously, if a student were using that as pretext to, like, bite someone, you’d want a supervisor stepping in, but to straight-up ban harmless elements of play-pretend like this is frankly asinine.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          As long as it does not infringe on the rights of school shooters I don’t think there’s any limits on how much students can be oppressed in school.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    i cannot begin to describe how utterly fucking stupid this is.

    I genuinely thought i died and went to hell when i first read this, this bill doesn’t even make any fucking sense. Child exhibiting “non human behaviors” could be considered “child abuse” according to this bill.

    How the fuck do you even enforce this?