More people need to learn to use Rational types. A pretty large majority of the numbers that people care about in real life can easily be represented by a ratio of integers, and they allow math with perfect precision.

Sigh. Guess I need the joke explained?

What’s wrong with strict types?

I seem to recall coming across a glossary that had something to the effect of,

mutual recursion - see recursion, mutual

recursion, mutual - see mutual recursion

I mean, I’m not really shocked. If you’ve ever seen bald eagles in the wild, they behave more like overgrown seagulls than the dignified predators you’ve been conditioned to expect - they even sound ridiculous.

Canada geese, though? They’ll straight up fuck you up.

The fact that someone else fixed the issue doesn’t really excuse the absolutely unacceptable original response to a very reasonable request.

I’m much more interested in seeing an apology, or any sort of indication that the dev understands how disrespectful they were.