European leaders holding emergency talks in Brussels have agreed on a massive increase to defence spending, amid a drive to shore up support for Ukraine after Donald Trump halted US military aid and intelligence sharing.

But the show of unity was marred by Hungary’s prime minister, Viktor Orbán, failing to endorse an EU statement on Ukraine pushing back against Trump’s Russia-friendly negotiating stance.

The 26 other EU leaders, including Orbán’s ally Robert Fico, the Slovakian prime minister, “firmly supported” the statement. “There can be no negotiations on Ukraine without Ukraine,” said the draft statement, a response to Trump’s attempt to sideline Europe and Kyiv.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    30 days ago

    Trump is an asshole, and the US should absolutely be the leader in defending Ukraine given it’s stockpiles and technologies and the immediacy of the need.

    At the same time, Europe was able to fund some pretty nice social programs by minimizing defense spending over the last few decades. They could only do that with aggressors on their borders by relying far too heavily on the US.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      The US government spends more per total capita on healthcare than any country with nationalized healthcare, but in the US it covers less than a third of the population.

      The US spends more on defense than anyone but it keeps fucking things up all around the world to justify those spendings.

      The US can afford social programs, it decides not to, so give us all a fucking break.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          You’re saying that Europe can afford social programs because it doesn’t spend as much as the USA in defense, implying the USA can’t afford those because they’re defending Europe, I’m saying the USA has no excuse not to offer social programs even with their current spendings.

          I’m 100% sure that Europe wouldn’t have cut their social programs if their defense budget was higher, it’s a governance choice to let your population eat shit and die and to waste money pretending to help it and that’s the choice the USA made.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      I keep hearing this but I’m a skeptic at heart. You wouldn’t happen to have some sources would you?

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      The US spends more per capita on healthcare than any country with socialised healthcare

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        You’re the second person to write that, and it’s entirely irrelevant to European military spending, Russia, and Ukraine.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          It’s completely relevant to your fallacious argument that other countries have social programs because the benevolent protection from the US.

          The US could have the best healthcare systems in the world without reducing military spending. It only doesn’t for the sake of the profit of insurance companies.

          Your social programs don’t suck because of your “benevoloent protection” (which has turned into a mafia protection racket now) but because American hyper-capitalist ideology is a barrier against being able to create effective social programs.

        • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          What I’m saying is that you can have those social programs that you say Europe has and the USA would actually be able to put even more money towards your military. Your current system is wildly less efficient because it’s setup to enrich middlemen (insurance companies).

          The social programs existing have nothing to do with military spending in Europe