• UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    While I get that people try to hurt Tesla’s sales, please don’t set random people’s property on fire. You might destroy the live of someone who bought a car before Edolf Musk rose to power and displayed the extent of his insanity.

    Couldn’t care less for Tesla’s fresh out the factory tho

    • stink@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Have a buddy whose dad pre-ordered a cybertruck as celebration for his retirement ~4 years ago.

      He’s trying to sell it now but he can’t even drive it because of the harassment lol, a lot of angry people

    • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I’m not excusing burning down innocent people’s property, but Teslas are not cheap.

      I doubt anyone who’d lose one would have their life destroyed.

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        So what are we saying? Destruction of people’s property is cool if it passes some arbitrary threshold that seems like they must be “well off” to own that property?

        Does that also mean it’s cool to rob anyone who owns a macbook, on the assumption they’d have a cheaper laptop if they weren’t loaded?

        Where I live, the taxi drivers primarily are driving Teslas and other electric cars because they do crazy mileage for their job and so over time the Tesla is actually the most economical choice for them. And that’s just a regular working class job.

          • tiramichu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            Well you said those words, but then followed on by saying what seems to be an excuse for exactly that - effectively they are rich so they can afford it

            • taxiiiii@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              The original commenter said that burning down Teslas might destroy the owners life. This is a car that costs somewhere between 40000 and 150000 dollars. Someone who can afford that is highly likely to recover, even if the insurance wouldn’t cover for it. That’s what this commenter pointed out.

              Stating that isn’t saying that it’s cool to burn down an unknown person’s car.

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Elon musk has been a known grifter for almost a decade now, also doing material damage is the only thing that actually works.

  • psud@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    If they want to hurt Tesla, attacking their customers’ cars won’t help

    • Jimius@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      It deters new customers. If a particular brand of car has a target painted on it. Either for ridicule, vandalism or destruction. Who is going to want a car like that? Besides, in terms of quality Tesla has been long surpassed by the incumbents anyway.

  • Ithorian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    This is so stupid, burn other people cars because of some stupid Millionaire. People are just dumb

  • 60d@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Just pay your deductible and you get those dmarks without the hassle of trying to sell a car nobody wants! Genius!

  • rhabarba@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Don’t these climate pigs know how shitty it is for the environment when an electric car burns? They must have been right-wing radicals!