Counterpoint: why should the standard for “just works” mean no CLI? What if distro maintainers decide that their user’s experience is improved by relegating some tasks to the shell?

Solution: install windows for them, but complain and evangelize at every opportunity. You’ll be so insufferable they’ll never ask you again.

I only use flatpack when I need the most up to date version of a software for whatever reason.

They clearly don’t consider their human capital to be all that important if they’re relagating hiring to ai. Take it as a signal that your value is too high for this company. Chaces are they would prefer to hire 2 year grads or bootcampers over experienced engineers.

Welll first you draw this head…

you know, I’m begining to think this whole “readiness” idea is completely arbitrary. The same people who today complain about linux’s supposed difficulty, were just fine using their home micro-computer in the 80’s. If you ask me, the only people who are defining what “ready” means, is Microsoft’s marketing department.

This meme just threatened to undo the last 3 years of daily driving linux, by making me consider going back to windows

I know it’s a meme, but I’ve never had this happen to me. What causes this?

We’ve come a long way. Once upon a time, It might’ve said “Linux is only free if you don’t value your time.”

guilty until proven innocent, for it is better that the innocent are condemed than for a guilty man go free. And should a trial be warranted, it shall be conducted not by jury, but by a tribunal of like-minded individuals.

they’re live the perfect anti-libral.

I don’t think performative politics is a FOSS community problem. It’s more of an whole Internet problem.