Nope. I don’t talk about myself like that.

  • 1 Post
  • 848 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle
  • Would seem so. The project is open source, and nobody is getting paid. So the lack of update makes sense to some extent.

    As cool as it is… and as much as I want to make plex shove it completely. Jellyfin just isn’t ready for prime-time.

    I run both… Jellyfin isn’t allowed to talk outside of my network at all, and I can access it over my personal VPN… But Plex is where all my users are because anything else would just be too annoying to maintain.








  • yes. windows xp was a fully local OS, and when you installed it, you stilled owned your computer. these things are not true of windows 10.

    Yes you can? It’s windows 11 that tries to lock you out, and even then you can install it without internet if you know the magic incantation…

    But windows 10 will just install with a local account if you don’t give it internet (unplug ethernet and never setup a wifi).

    sure, and I could say you’re a chainsaw juggling pedophile lizard person who came from the future to make sure flavored foams don’t have a resurgence in upscale dining at any cost because the consequences, drawn out 200 years, are so much worse than fascism and several possible extinction events. saying shit is easy. doesn’t make it true.

    The fuck? Any linux install will eventually become unsupported. That is my claim to counter your nonsense claim of Windows becoming unusable.

    Go take your pills.



  • Flying has required a Real ID-based identification for a little while now. Terry stops have enabled cops to stop and identify as long as a cop has “reasonable suspicion”.

    There’s nothing to wake up before anymore. It’s been like this for a while… Long before Orange Man took office with terry stops starting in the 60’s, and real id being signed by congress in 2005 (though rollout has been slow).

    The “registry rules” is just another thing that people skipping out on their visa’s will also violate… So I’m not sure what the point of that would be necessarily. But I don’t see why anyone would be up and arms about an attempt to track those who are overstaying the country they’re in. It seems reasonable to require a check-in for extended visas. The “best” thing it could do is identify those who intend to skip out a few months earlier which I guess could have some value… at the annoyance of creating check-ins for others.



  • Clearly you didn’t… You keep asserting false statements that have already been disproven with sources.

    But ultimately it’s the same thing. You need 4 pieces of input. Either 3 satellites AND elevation. Or 4 satellites.

    If a watch doesn’t “know” elevation (barometer or other sensor providing such information) as the fourth data point… Then it NEEDS 4 satellites to make the data points whole. Making your statements yet again wrong. I’ve covered the cases… but you keep pushing false statements like “gps is triangulation” (completely incorrect) or “GPS uses 3 satellites” which is also only correct in one very specific case… Where it’s largely 4 or more, with reality being more like as many satellites as the device can read the pulses for. Often being a dozen or even more…

    I am making accurate and complete statements. You are the one peddling misinformation.

    Hell to prove the point… my time server grabs GPS as it’s primary source. It grabs up to 12 satellites to sync time. It shows me my sync status for lat/long as well… At 3 satellites it CANNOT get a lock for location OR time. At 4 it gets a weak lock.



  • A watch… or other simple gps device doesn’t know what the elevation is.

    Only one of the 2 selected points in a 3 satellite setup will be valid. And your device would have no idea which one is valid without elevation knowledge or a 4th satellite. Some devices can figure it out with just 3 satellites. Many/most won’t. But ultimately it’s the same thing. You need 4 pieces of input. Either 3 satellites AND elevation. Or 4 satellites.

    So no. I’ve not made a point “for” you. You’re just ignorant or specifically being obtuse on something you clearly don’t understand.