What about 1?

I like 303, very friendly like a shamrock.

But not 707, too sharp.

404 is weird.

27 is one of my favorites.

I have always liked 8, but mostly because 2³

3443 is another great one.

I thought Dulles was basically just one long, straight line building

No

I prefer cut, I like how the gemstone sparkles and shimmers in the light, even if it is less massive afterwards.

Uncut is known and loved, but I’ve heard an argument that the lore is tighter in certain edits. I don’t remember the details though.

Don’t they monitor what you copy to thumb drives?

“Hermione”

That’s how it looks.

I also pronounce Taurus closer to “Tarus” than toorus.

I did misunderstand. You were responding to

Something is only a fee if you can’t afford it

Which I understood in the general case. Like I’ve heard of rich jerks that park illegally because the fee isn’t enough to bother them.

How do they hijack your own link? Is OpenTable a Google product?

Technically you still paid money, j just not a meaningful amount compared to your total.

Is it a corporation, or will it be blamed on just the mistake of an AI, or something else? I don’t trust society’s track record for holding corporations accountable.

Yeah I’m just not sure how it has cookies since I used tubular…

That hasn’t stopped various humans from saying this on the Internet for a long time

It’s interesting to me that they scan the video, and then know that I watched it (on tubular) when I’m visiting a completely unrelated website in a different browser, and serve me an ad there.

Many archaic cultures had words for 1, 2, 3, and “many”. You can see this tendency reflected in the Roman system where I, II, and III are obvious symbols, but IV introduces two new concepts: V for five, and the system where putting a symbol to the left represents that much less than the next symbol.

Therefore I think 1, 2, and 3 are based on counting on fingers, but 4 is where their system deviates.

The ad was not on Lemmy, it was an automated ad on a random article I found on Lemmy. The kind where behind the scenes, the ad vendor auctions off the space and your information to the bot that’s the highest bidder

I doubt this because it is not a product people would buy in any volume, and was just used to illustrate a random point. Also the video has been out less than 24 hours. I don’t think it’s likely in this case.

But on the other hand, if millions of people watch something, I guess some percentage will buy the thing they see… huh.

Thanks for this suggestion.

Wait a second, how would Anker/Amazon know that people who watch the video are likely to buy that item? Would Google send Amazon the exact watch history of each customer and they identify videos in common?

🎵I’m just kidding like Jason… unless you’re gonna do it 🎶