The claim was that by your reasoning, situations that are not terrorism would be classified as terrorism.

Analogy. I’m simply applying your reasoning to designate random murders as terrorism.

“It’s clear that the mass murderer didn’t have personal beef with the women he killed. It’s ideological because he hates society.”

The only thing we achieve by calling the CEO murder “terrorism” is to make terrorism look cool. This seems like a mistake since nobody was terrorized except actual real life terrorists (billionaires).

If every ideological thought is also political, then so are most murders.

If everything is political, then nothing is political.