• cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      But also, we cannot have so many god-damn satellites polluting the night sky. Starlink should never have been allowed to get up there as a private actor in the first place.

      It’s a tricky situation, as international cooperation would be extremely difficult to maintain, especially during situations like the Ukraine war. But having private companies compete to fill the orbit with space waste as soon as possible is hardly a good solution either.

  • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    Bye bye future space launches once we have full or partial Kessler syndrome.

    Bye bye earth based astronomy.

    But dang this tech is so much better than Hughesnet

    <ButtonPressingMeme>

  • bassad@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    Is starlink business model like uber/airbnb? Killing the market with low prices by circumventing regulations to establish their monopoly?

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      No, it just vertical integration. You need to send up rockets to make money, so you make sure they never have an empty slot on them by filling it yourself. You get enough satellites up, then you have a revenue generating payload you can send up steady from then on.

      • bassad@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Then it is a monopoly building if you take the limited slots before others companies 😁

        I was wondering because starlink’s terminals are around $500 while eutelsat’s are 10k. It seems it can be only possible if you accept massive losses on first years, with help of to investors to keep the company running, to take down competitors. Like uber and many others did, which had years of losses before having income.

  • Bev's Dad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    It’ll be interesting to see what the Canadian telesat LEO system will be capable of. They’re supposed to be launching satellites next year and are using a higher orbit so will need much fewer satellites than starlink.

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    I didn’t read the article but I’d bet the “why” is because it’s been on the news and people think it’s an easy way to make a quick buck. However, these people are amateurs - when it’s in the news you’re already too late.

  • mbirth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    “European Starlink rival” is a bit far fetched when there’s merely rumours that they might be able to offer a similar service. But that’s the stock market for you.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 days ago

      They have both GEO and LEO satellites. Not on the scale of SpaceX (for LEO), but they do have a network.

      I am not commenting on the nature of the stock market or anything like that. Just pointing out that they do have a working network, it’s not 100% speculation (like you see with crypto schemes).

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        You’re correct but their LEO constellation is over 10x smaller than Starlink, so they’ve still got a lot of catching up to do.

        They are doing much better than other fabled starlink competitors though, like amazon kuiper which is still not a real thing after all this time.

        • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 days ago

          They have one strong competitive advantage that Starlink will never have; they are not American.

          By definition, you cannot trust an American service. Even if the people who run a given service are not degenerates, there are enough degenerates in the US that they could elect a degenerate who will fuck you over.

        • GrosPapatouf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          They have very, very different business models. Constellation size is meaningless on its own, you have to account for the satellites capabilities, orbits, and the number and needs of your customers.

    • Skvlp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Now they have to offer a similar service. No pressure then 😊

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    This is why I will never be rich. I never see business opportunities to buy tons of stock and act upon them.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          I have nothing against people investing, it’s just not accurate to think the average person can invest and get somewhere with it, back in the 70s or earlier Warren Buffett said you needed to have around $300,000 invested to make any kind of reasonable gain, adjusting for inflation $300k in 1970 dollars is $2.5 million. When you’re below that threshold your not really getting returns you can do something with. It’s fine to invest less, it’s fine to invest aggressively even if you are poor, just don’t look at people with less than $2.5mil like their dumb for not investing more. It doesn’t work that way.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    A European Starlink rival’s shares skyrocketed 390% in a week — here’s why

    OOOH!!! OOH!!! I KNOW THIS ONE!!! STARLINK GO BOOM! PEOPLE GO NOPE! TESLAS STOCK PRICE GO (bomb falling sound effects) KABOOM!!!

  • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    SpaceX and Starlink have no competitors. They’re so far ahead that it’s not even funny. I really wish Elon had just kept his mouth shut and kept working on it without sullying its image. I bet he wishes that too sometimes.

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      Clearly not what he wishes. Shows no regrets whatsoever. He wishes for everyone to lick his boots and obey whatever he thinks is right. He’s acting like he’s a king or god or so… He gets what he deserves, disrespect and contracts failing. They might lead technologically but that’s no reason to take all this BS. It’s extra reason not to.

      • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        I don’t know, the man is hard to read. I’m extremely cynical and I don’t believe he’s genuine ever, but he gave an interview recently and he did choke up when asked how he was managing to run his companies. I don’t think he’s as good an actor to fake that.

        The best conclusion I have arrived is that the man may well be completely self deluded and he might really believe himself the savior of mankind so he needs to get us to mars by any means necessary. Maybe because of the heavy drug use and obvious sleep deprivation, his sense of reality is probably warped. Or maybe the pressure from the Twitter purchase got to him and he broke because that’s when he absolutely went bonkers. He had to overleverage himself in order to do that and he even took money from the saudis.

        All in all I don’t expect things to end well for him.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      I was just talking about this with a friend today. Musk was basically on track to become a real-life Tony Stark, exactly as he’d envisioned, but he just couldn’t keep his mouth shut and ended up ruining it for himself. Money buys many things, but it doesn’t buy respect - and once you’ve lost that, it’s nearly impossible to regain. The number of young and ambitious people he let down is simply staggering. I was really rooting for him and hoping he’d turn this around but after the nazi salute I no longer do. That was the last straw for me.

    • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Idk. Musk seems to have gone completely mental. Dunno what the cause is, but the man is not healthy. Not sure how much self-reflection he’s capable of.

      • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        It’s not a mode of thinking it’s a fact. As of this moment there’s no one who is even close to being a competitor to them. I’m not saying there can’t be one, but there isn’t one right now.

        • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          I am not denying Starlink and SpaceX have a dominant market position.

          When I said “this is a very soviet mode of thinking,” I meant that it’s unreasonable to think that they are unbeatable.

          This is just one thing, but if you use Starlink or SpaceX you have to deal with Americans and Americans cannot be trusted.

          Being a reliable partner is a competitive advantage and has an impact on the cost function of a given relationship. Americans (government or companies) are not reliable.