• davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I don’t think federation vs centralization is the primary differentiator. I think corporate vs non-profit/ad-free/donation-only/volunteerism is. Our marketing budget is goose egg. It’s all word-of-mouth.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        I can also see some people being opposed to them spending the donation money on ads, since they’d be giving money to companies that may be in opposition to what we’re doing here (or ideological reasons around the advertising industry in general).

        Maybe if there was a separate pool of donations specifically for advertising, then people who want to support that can donate to it? Those who don’t can still donate to the projects themselves

  • phanto@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    In my IT program at school, the only people who have heard of the fediverse are the ones I’ve told.

  • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    I don’t think the average user thinks much about the platform they’re on, and about who controls it. I think they go to wherever most of their family/friends are.

    Also, those platforms are firmly in the mainstream, the alternatives aren’t really - you’d have to actively go search for them. People just aren’t likely to do that, I don’t think.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    People follow the crowd and centralized media had considerably bigger crowds

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Not to mention “most people” wouldn’t fit in here or feel welcome. Remember Donald Trump won the popular vote and even those who didn’t vote didn’t feel strongly enough about either side to pick one or the other. It’s not just the US, far right candidates keep gaining popularity in parts of Europe. And I think a lot of people aren’t interested in Star Trek or trans rights. The niche communities have very low levels of activity too. The fediverse just isn’t for everyone.

  • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Lazy. Most people don’t want to learn how shit works. They just want it to work. They’ll get what they pay for in the end.

    edit: downvote all you want. it’s a correct assertion to the question. just because you don’t like it doesn’t make it correct.

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      Hardcore facebookers don’t care even if zuck fed babies to pet lion every morning. TikTokers are even worse. Clout is what they are and that’s all they care about. Switching to an another system is a no go and if you bring it up they get really pissy.

  • Alice@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    I like to follow a couple reporters directly as opposed to subscribing to the local paper and wading through the fluff pieces, so that means using Bluesky.

    Back when I was still an artist for my super niche internet garbage, that meant using Tumblr, then after the Tumblr purge, Twitter. Then after Musk, cohost, then after cohost… I mean, I was done with art but I’d probably be on Bluesky for that too.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Most people don’t care about things. This is kind of a recurring problem. Imagine if people just cared a little bit more. All sorts of problems, like littering, would just go away.

    But people are lazy and don’t care. They don’t care that their behavior today will be a problem for them tomorrow.

    The big sites are where the content is, and that’s what they want. Suffering a little bit of hardship (fewer memes) in order to bolster a stronger future? Ridiculous.

  • kobra@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago
    1. Ease of use

    The combination of having to choose an instance and then start with an algorithm free blank slate is a tough ask. It literally takes time to sit down and setup your initial “feed”, which is probably a good thing, but not at all what attracts users whimsical curiosities nor what they’ve experienced over their entire existence with social media.

  • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    People are giving great answers here. One I didn’t notice at a glance is that the Fediverse is feckin small. Most of the world doesn’t know it exists yet, and centralized social medias are probably not gonna be super big about pushing that info through their algorithms

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    There are going to be layers to this.

    1. There are lots of people who are just downright too stupid. They wouldn’t be on the internet at all if Tim Apple didn’t put it in a baby baba for them to suck it out of. They use Facebook because their iPhone came with the Facebook app pre-installed.

    2. There are lots of people for whom popularity is the only thing that exists. Their brain cannot function beyond “Everyone uses Twitter.” They’ll adopt this platform only after everyone else in the world does.

    3. There are lots of people who have bought the propaganda. The dark web is for drug traffickers and hitmen, torrenting is for pirates, end-to-end encryption is for traitors, and Mastodon is for Linux neckbeards. You shouldn’t associate with those people.

    4. There’s this weird trend where the commercial platforms are becoming hives for conservatives, so they’re probably going to stay put in their echo chambers. I have observed little to no presence of actual conservatives on this platform; beyond the horseshoe effect with the tankie crowd.

    5. The culture of content consumption is not supported by the Fediverse. We don’t do algorithmic slop troughs here, and the amount of content on Peertube and Loops rounds down to zero, so it doesn’t fulfill the role of mesmerizing colors and sounds for staring at and drooling like Tiktok does or linear television did.

    6. Open source software is usually a bit shit. Be it lack of budget, opinionated developers, redundant projects…we can never have one of something. Why does Lemmy, Mbin and Piefed exist simultaneously? We always end up with software that mostly works, has a lot less graphical polish, a shitty project name, a few missing key features and a couple workarounds you just have to know about. Or an intentionally godawful UI. That’ll put people off.

    7. A few people who show up are going to be put off by the weirdest decision they’ll be asked to make this month: “Choose an instance, your choice doesn’t matter, just pick one.” If it doesn’t matter, why make me pick? I bet if you watched 100 people try to sign up for a Fediverse platform, at least 30 of them will balk at that stage. I’ve sat and stared at that for awhile myself and I’m one of the ones who made it through.

    8. They just haven’t heard of us. Ask ten people you know in real life if they’ve heard of Lemmy, or Mastodon, or Pixelfed. I bet they haven’t, or if they have they let it pass in one ear and out the other out of apathy.

    9. A few people have looked at the Fediverse, didn’t see what they wanted here, and left. If you play Satisfactory, for example, you’ll find an active subreddit where the majority of the player base and the developers of the game interact, on Lemmy you’ll find one community where exactly one person posts “daily screenshots until I get bored.” It’s easy to wander off, especially if you don’t like left wing politics, Linux and the Fediverse itself.

    • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      “Choose an instance, your choice doesn’t matter, just pick one.” If it doesn’t matter, why make me pick?

      Email requires you to pick a provider, but it doesn’t matter.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        I feel like this issue will solve itself with scale. You’ll end up signing up with the one hosting the community you came over for first and moving if you don’t like it

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Gotta say, the biggest reason I’m not on Pixedfed is because I was told that I could migrate my instagram content, but the two instances I signed up for had that option disabled. I can’t seem to find an instance that tells you upfront if it’s allowed or not, and I’ve already wasted enough time on it.

        • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Speaking of complaints we have about the fediverse…

          You linked to a post on sh.itjust.works, but I’m on slrpnk.net, so if I want to interact with it, I have hoops to jump through first.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Or I would have had hoops to jump through to get the lemmy.world link where that comment is (nominally) hosted. There’s a chainlink icon and a technicolor pentagram icon, neither of those do it. I either have to manually go to lemmy.world’s website, find the comment there, copy the link from there, come back to my account at sh.itjust.works and post it, or I post a sh.itjust.works link and send everyone on an indirect path. It’s…not good.

  • Libra00@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Inertia, convenience of what you’re used to, and all of your friends are over there and have never heard of ‘the fediverse’.

  • Fecundpossum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Do you want them here? I don’t. I don’t tell a soul about lemmy, because this is place for me to get away from them. A place for mostly rational discussion, populated by people free thinking enough to seek an alternative. If the masses descended on Lemmy, they’d ruin it like they ruin everything else. They’d draw the attention that would lead to it being litigated, regulated, purchased, corporatized etc. Let them stay on Facebook and Reddit.

    • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      This sounds like a very gatekeeper and elitist mentality. Also, Lemmy is FLOSS, they can’t buy it up or destroy it.

      • Fecundpossum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        The current US administration and its demagogues and lackeys have been doing all sorts of things they shouldn’t be able to do in a normal society. You’d be amazed at how quickly they’d be able to shut down a form of mass media they can’t control.

        It’s fine if you don’t like my mentality. I’m highly selective about who I let into to my day to day life in meatspace. I like small gatherings, and keep a high bar for who I want to associate with. I don’t see why I shouldn’t apply the same principle to my internet life.