Wouldn’t that be getting rid of the libs?
I think this would be ‘owning’ the libs:
chown -R $(whoami) /usr/libchown -R nobody:nobody /usr/libChowning the libs.
Ain’t nobody owning these libs
only if
chown -R nobody:nobody /usr/libreturns a nonzero status code right?
For best results, use: clown
Why does that shift key say delete?
Also that usually doesn’t execute a typed in line.
I’m confused.
Looks like a perfectly normal “Enter” key on an ANSI keyboard. Why the confusion?
Looks like the return key, must be an AI keyboard.
Must be some obscure keyboard layout.
No I’m pretty sure that would be chown
elon would probably do this for real if you told him it owned the libs
Out of the loop ? Let me explain :
The text in the image is a computer command that can run on Unix Linux computers and it removes an important part of the operating system that is called “lib”.
After running this successfully, part of the operating system would have to be reinstalled.
The joke is that “lib” can also mean liberal which is one of the denomination for Democratic party members in the USA.
That (joke) would be an attack on this group by the saying : “owning the liberals”.
[main@nixos-laptop:~]$ ls /usr/lib
ls: cannot access ‘/usr/lib’: No such file or directory
…success?
Ahem…
chown [OWNER] /usr/libserious: how important is that to the system? and how destructive is it?
Those are libraries used by user space applications. Most distros won’t boot without them, but you can still get into a recovery shell.
