Wait aren’t all airplane wings bid inspired?

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Airbus explained that it ran the numbers and found that, while it could build a successful hydrogen airliner, the plane would be successful in the same way that Concorde was successful. In other words, a technological triumph, but a commercial failure.

    Just like any other hydrogen powered… Anything.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s because hydrogen is a terrible fuel. In theory it could work, but there were so many practical problems with compressing the hydrogen into storage tanks and then keeping it in those storage tanks but the amount of effort you have to go through to make it work completely negates any performance benefits.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        also most hydrogen now is not green at all, the production of it uses methane and releases CO2. only a small percent of hydrogen is truly green, and very expensive.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        But its only exhaust is PuRe wATeR!! /s

        It still makes me LOL to see people tout this, when battery EVs don’t exhaust anything.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            They are without significant improvements in battery technology. Lithium Ion simply doesn’t have the energy density to be able to lift its own weight.