Its a space of 1meter×1meterx1meter, basically a cubic meter where the matter replicator works on. (So, no replicating cars, since its too big)

How do you min-max this?

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Obviously everybody now has high end computers, cameras, a variety of lenses, phones, etc. Foldable Ebikes like the aipas would fit in the space.

    1 meter solar panels are a hit but since most batteries and capacitors require materials difficult to handle it becomes highly demanded.

    Every political building now has thick blastproof exteriors as making bombs has never been easier, judges live in the courthouse now.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    The main thing is positioning in order to reduce wasted space as much as possible. As someone with a 3D printer, I have a teensy bit of an idea on how to position “ready-made” to maximize space. I certainly cannot print/replicate a fully mounted car frame in a single cubic meter, but I can print parts of the frame in such a way that I can mount them like legos, if each rod is 5x5x99cm, I can fit roughly 361 (19x19, with a bit of space between them so they don’t come fused) in the cubic meter. Is that enough to make the whole frame? No idea.

    Also, think about it, 1 cubic meter of sandwiches, tacos, pizza and other junk food tasting great AND being perfectly healthy. Damn, now I’m hungry.

  • binary45@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’d say that society as we know it would collapse fairly quickly, with it being replaced by a communist or socialist system fairly quickly. Fields that require brains would be in significant demand, as food would become a non issue. Same thing would occur with other essentials, such as food and medicine. As mentioned in other comments, money would become worthless. And there would be people who would make new replicators who would have reverse engineered their replicators.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t think it would.

      First, you’d have to power the device, which is likely going to take a lot of energy.

      Second, the device is additive only, so it can’t address issues with built in scarcity like land.

      Third, there is going to be an interesting middle ground where you still need some forms of manufacturing to run the economy.

      There will be drastic changes to the economy, but I doubt that communism would fully take over.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I was busy thinking about that. Why not make a replicator without limits if possible? No downsides because then you’d be able to create what you want when you want. Anyone dumb enough not to think of that would be stuck using it once a day while you are able to create all you want.

    • TeamBrett@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Wouldn’t you need two replicators? One to be replicated and one to do the replicating? And if the replicator itself is a box (assumption since it was not specifies) the replicator would have to be larger than the max size.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    First I’m gonna move out of my apartment since there will sure be plenty of geniuses who’s gonna produce 1 cubic meter of solid gold, and the building might not be happy about 20-ton blocks appearing out of thin air.

  • Pudutr0n@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    Even if you didn’t want to use it for money, you’d have to use it for money somehow just to keep up with the inflation.

    • anon6789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      In Stephenson’s “Diamond Age” novel, even the super poor had basic access to in-home replicators. They were limited to pretty basic items, but they were available.

      With everyone having access to basic goods, the rich people would go to villages of artisans that would hand make items to get unique, one of a kind things, as most crafts were now basically lost skills to most of society.

      Throughout the story, the tech is explored and eventually hacked to upend society by removing limits on what can be generated by the replicator.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Have the replicator print a replicator that auto-prints identical copies of itself as often as it can so you can cause the collapse of reality without having to be involved.

      Hell, have the replicator print a replicator without the 24-hour cooldown to hurry things along a little

  • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    It only takes one person to make 1 cubic meter of black hole to destroy the biosphere by ripping Earth into an acretion disc.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        A cubic meter of the core of a neutron star would still count as matter. While it probably wouldn’t literally destroy the Earth, I wouldn’t want to be on the same…continent…when that thing went off.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Ah, i thought it was a hole in space or something like that, so the absence of anything, and even space was something, but not matter specifically.

          • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            It is worthwhile to note that the above is highly reductive. A “black hole” is the sort of “hole” in spacetime you’re thinking of. It is caused, however, by gravitational dilation of spacetime by an incredibly high energy density. If you stuff enough matter and energy into a tiny enough space, the gravitational force will be strong enough that no other force in the universe can keep it from getting closer, and closer. Even the forces which keep neutrons and protons from combining with each other will be surmounted, as the energy density increases asymptotically toward infinity. This tiny point of effectively infinite density is the black hole’s “singularity”. Surrounding this singularity is a region where anything (matter, light, space itself) that gets within that range cannot escape. This is because objects have escape velocities based on their masses. If you’re going fast enough, you’ll fly away from the earth never to return. If you’re not going that fast, eventually you’ll fall back down. The further you are from the earth, the easier it is to escape it. The “black” part of the black hole, called the “event horizon”, is the distance from the singularity at which the black hole’s escape velocity is equal to the speed of light, meaning that, closer than that, nothing can escape it. Hence why it’s “black”, because no light is escaping from it. Technically, a black hole is not perfectly black due to hawking radiation, and a black hole with a 0.5 meter schwarzchild radius would probably be small enough to visibly glow (just a bit). (probably not, see below)

            • Zink@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              According to a random block hole calculator I found, a black hole with a 0.5m radius would be over 56 earth masses and the temperature would only be 0.000364 K. So, still orders of magnitude less than the cosmic microwave background.

              I know smaller black holes evaporate faster, but even that little thing (according to the calculator) would have a lifetime of a gargantuan multiple of the age of the universe. Like roughly a number followed by 45 zeros, times the age of the universe.

              The calculator: https://www.vttoth.com/CMS/physics-notes/311-hawking-radiation-calculator

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Get together with your neighbor, replicate the parts of each other’s replicator. Repeat this daily for a bit. Exponential growth. Give it a month or so, then just go ham and make everything you want, maybe after renting a warehouse to keep them all in.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I feel the upper limit of this is probably depends on how many simultaneously unrelated things you can put on the print bed at once. Like, can I have it print me a pair of shoes, 6 sandwiches, an SD card and a bag of cat kibble all at once? Or is it going to make 6 SD kibble card sandwiches on shoe-bread? 1m³ will hold my entire groceries list for the week, but if I have to print each item individually I’ll starve.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Well… 1m^3 of rice, then the next day 1m^3 of beans, then the next day 1m^3 of potatoes, etc. - you might not like what you’re eating for the first few days, but I think you could pretty quickly accumulate enough ingredients in massive quantities to make some pretty nice meals, even if that limitation does exist.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      If you can disassemble them, this is probably a good way to eliminate bounds on throughput, but honestly, even a little coordination permits for pretty enormous throughput from the get-go. You’ve got a lot of people out there.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    The obvious answer: Use your replicator to replicate more replicators.

    The correct answer: The Young Lady’s Illustrated Primer.

    The clever dick corollary: 1m3 is actually quite a large volume, and ain’t no rule says you can only replicate one object at a time. If whatever luxury item or commodity you want is small in volume, which it probably is, don’t forget you can replicate a whole bunch of it within a meter cube.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    You say it can create an object of a single M3.

    I create a second one by replicating the parts.

    May take a while but when the second one comes online the third one will be even faster.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I feel the astounding energy needed to create matter would be the reason for the cooldown, so having more than one would make little difference.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        It can’t be the energy. It has to be a matter rearranger, not something that makes matter from raw energy. Consider a cubic meter of water. It will have a mass of 1000 kg. By E=mc^2, that water has a mass energy of 9e19 Joules. New homes in the US are built with 200 amp panels, delivering power at 120V. The typical new home can draw up to 24,000 Watts from the grid.

        At this max output, it would take a house 120 million years to draw enough electricity to create a cubic meter of water from nothing but pure electrical energy.

        So this thing must actually work as a matter rearranger. You provide it a supply of pure elements and it synthesizes from there. Or, if it’s fancy, it creates elements by rearranging nuclei. But it can’t be something that truly creates matter ex nihilo.

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        My reading of the question implies that the replicator has the cool down. so having a second one will have an independent cool down.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I suspect a lot of guns, explosives, body armor and anti-armor munitions due to the immediate civil war that would break out in most countries as the wealthy elite tells the government to confiscate everyones matter replicators.