

That which Elon Musk hath wrought upon Argentina is now being revisited upon these United States by he
That which Elon Musk hath wrought upon Argentina is now being revisited upon these United States by he
You can also “simply” raw-dog Wireguard. It’s built into the Linux kernel, so you barely have to install anything besides the userspace tools.
Basically, I objected to being reliant on the generosity of a for-profit company. “We do these things not because they are easy, but because we thought they would be easy.”
This is a rough sketch:
wg-quick
.Boom. Tailscale’d.
I’m sure I’ve forgotten some steps. I have some janky automation that’s broken in a new way every time I try to use it.
I thought flies use ZZ
for the onomatopoeia
This is the same logic people like Kennedy use.
It’s not the same logic it all? It’s not a huge leap to guess that we’re about to have a measles or bird flu pandemic.
Talk to your doctor about whether this would be helpful or effective. Don’t just go get vaccines because “if one is good two must be better!”
Did they recommend getting non-evidence-based repeat vaccinations? It just sounded like they recommended getting vaccinations that are not commonly given to US unless they’re traveling.
Is it poly if two are identical twins who secretly take turns and the third thinks they’re with one person?
I have no opinion of them, but I’m curious why advertising would imply untrustworthiness. Are you saying they’re too eager or something? Spending money on ads is also consistent with a company that’s making money by charging for a service — I’d be more suspicious of free VPNs.
Given the warning about capitalization, the best possible case is that they’re using ast.literal_eval() rather than throwing untrusted input into eval()
.
Err, I guess they might be comparing strings to ‘True’ and are choosing to be really strict about capitalization for some reason.
Don’t worry, Elon will just announce on X that he and the DOGE boys Neuralink’d Trump’s mind into the Starlink satellites. It’s totally still Donny calling the shots.
It’s gonna be hot Hot HOT!!
While technically true, it feels kinda blamey and thought-terminating. I prefer to view addiction as a medical condition because it puts the focus on treatment and prevention rather than who did wrong.
My knife is printf, but my scalpel is gdb.
Are you arguing that assembly languages are not architecture-specific? I don’t think that’s the typical definition.
Nasm is an assembler, but it also represents a specific assembly language targeting x86 architectures.
Gas is an assembler of a higher order. It can emit code for many architectures, and thus it accepts many different architecture-specific assembly languages.