Also: stallman is a character and has been associated with a pedophelia/ebephilia yikes semi reasonable Epstein takes and a lack of understanding that consenting sex with a minor causes harm.

“Critical Thinker” Yikes. Somehow the right made that a forbidden word in my mind because they hide behind that as an excuse for asking terrible questions etc.

Anyway. Allegedly the statistics are rather mediocre for self driving cars. But sadly I haven’t seen a good statistic about that, either. The issue here is that automatable tasks are lower risk driving situations so having a good statistic is near impossible. E.g. miles driven are heavily skewed when you are only used on highways as a driver. There are no simple numbers that will tell you anything of worth.

That being said the title should be about the mistake that happened without fundamental statements (i.e. self driving is bad because motorcyclists die).

That’s a hilarious project

Murdered and abducted, newspeak nobody.

That’s not always good. Maybe they just did not read the handle and assumed someone random asked, but didn’t know they wanted this library. That’s probably a good assumption, too.

Bad experiences from the past are valid reasons to be apprehensive.

Ok, but what did they try to do as a SaaS?

Yes. Unless you have a really good reasons there are safe and portable versions you should use instead.

If you tell the Compiler to be careful and avoid writing c code c++ does not segfault. This is a user error.

You can technically even write Assembler code and compile with gpp.

My Lemmy instance only owns this account, not secondary accounts on separate websites

But why? Just use a password manager instead of tying your identity to a Lemmy instance which you do not control.

Having SSO is reliant on having a single trusted server which has your password instead of you maintaining it yourself. This is just an unnecessary risk.

Am EU, have seen plastic sushi decor.

Not my point. I just presented an argument for closing the thread. There is a valid conversation to be had, but having it is difficult.

Doesn’t justify doing so as well. It should be punished the same way. But don’t complain about you being punished, but justice being served unequally.

If it gets racist or vile you still need to shut it down. This is a topic poised to become racial stereotypes told by majorities about minorities. You usually don’t verify the origin of the claimants.

E.g. those Turks and their bazaars trying to scam each other of the last penny, or something antisemitic.

I might have erred on the side of caution as well.

Saying without saying is still saying. Reddit mods may be stupid, but not that stupid.

Do you think you can trick the rules by just prefacing everything with “I am not say, that…”

Most economically relevant states are blue, especially on the border.